<p class="ql-block"> </p><p class="ql-block"><b style="font-size:20px;">作者：楊思穎（碩士、田野規(guī)劃師）</b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><ul><li><span style="font-size:15px; color:rgb(255, 138, 0);">【項(xiàng)目名稱】 澳洲田野規(guī)劃研究</span></li><li><span style="font-size:15px; color:rgb(255, 138, 0);">【內(nèi)容摘要】 作者學(xué)習(xí)了Jack Manning Bancroft的《Hoodie Economics》，其“經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)應(yīng)反映珍視之物”“改變看不見(jiàn)人的系統(tǒng)”等觀點(diǎn)，與作者關(guān)注的“文化能量”及譚必友教授的“文化能量說(shuō)”相呼應(yīng)，讓作者明確了以傾聽(tīng)和共情見(jiàn)證文化能量流動(dòng)的實(shí)習(xí)方向。</span></li><li><span style="font-size:15px; color:rgb(255, 138, 0);">【關(guān)鍵詞】社會(huì)工作案例；原住民導(dǎo)師體驗(yàn)；Hoodie Economics 、海草隱喻與文化能量論</span></li><li><span style="font-size:15px; color:rgb(255, 138, 0);">【資助單位】長(zhǎng)沙玖業(yè)教育咨詢有限公司</span></li><li><span style="font-size:15px; color:rgb(255, 138, 0);">【學(xué)術(shù)單位】湖南師范大學(xué)民族學(xué)與人類學(xué)研究中心</span></li></ul><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block" style="text-align:center;"><b style="color:rgb(21, 100, 250); font-size:20px;">— 編者按 —</b></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(176, 79, 187); font-size:15px;">本文記錄了作者楊思穎在澳大利亞AIME（澳大利亞原住民導(dǎo)師體驗(yàn)計(jì)劃）實(shí)習(xí)首日的經(jīng)歷與感悟。7月14日，作者以在線面試開(kāi)啟實(shí)習(xí)，不同于國(guó)內(nèi)側(cè)重專業(yè)技能的面試模式，AIME面試官以個(gè)人經(jīng)歷開(kāi)場(chǎng)，凸顯對(duì)“人”本身的關(guān)注，且面試中臨時(shí)邀請(qǐng)作者當(dāng)日前往距住處僅5分鐘路程的實(shí)習(xí)場(chǎng)地，讓其對(duì)跨文化實(shí)踐中“田野”的內(nèi)涵有了新理解。</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(176, 79, 187); font-size:15px;">實(shí)習(xí)首日，作者學(xué)習(xí)了Jack Manning Bancroft的《Hoodie Economics》，其“經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)應(yīng)反映珍視之物”“改變看不見(jiàn)人的系統(tǒng)”等觀點(diǎn)，與作者關(guān)注的“文化能量”及譚必友教授的“文化能量說(shuō)”相呼應(yīng)，讓作者明確了以傾聽(tīng)和共情見(jiàn)證文化能量流動(dòng)的實(shí)習(xí)方向。</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(176, 79, 187); font-size:15px;">此外，作者觀看了短片《Sea the Weed》，“雜草”的隱喻引發(fā)其對(duì)邊緣文化價(jià)值及過(guò)往田野工作的反思，認(rèn)識(shí)到社會(huì)工作應(yīng)先“看見(jiàn)”而非“修復(fù)”。初探IMAGI-NATION平臺(tái)，其以文化、想象和陪伴為核心的特質(zhì)，也與相關(guān)理念及湘西苗拳傳承經(jīng)驗(yàn)相通。</span></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">7 月 14 日，我的 AIME 實(shí)習(xí)正式拉開(kāi)序幕。為了這場(chǎng)上午 10 點(diǎn)的在線入職面試，我提前三天就反復(fù)梳理了過(guò)往的文化研究案例，甚至對(duì)著鏡子演練自我介紹 —— 畢竟在國(guó)內(nèi)的實(shí)習(xí)面試?yán)?，專業(yè)技能與項(xiàng)目經(jīng)歷永遠(yuǎn)是核心。但屏幕亮起的瞬間，預(yù)想中的 “提問(wèn) - 作答” 模式并未出現(xiàn)：面試官先笑著做起了自我介紹，年齡，自己在 AIME 的 12年工作經(jīng)歷，說(shuō)到自己有兩個(gè)小孩，連 “大女兒最近總模仿原住民長(zhǎng)老講故事的語(yǔ)氣” 這種生活細(xì)節(jié)都自然提及。這種帶著體溫的開(kāi)場(chǎng)讓我緊繃的神經(jīng)漸漸松弛，原來(lái)在這里，<b style="color:rgb(237, 35, 8);">“人” 的本身比 “履歷” 更先被看見(jiàn)。</b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">一場(chǎng)在線入職面試成為了這場(chǎng)跨文化實(shí)踐的起點(diǎn)，卻讓我對(duì)“田野”的理解有了新的注解——原來(lái)文化的碰撞與理念的共鳴，不必依賴物理空間的直接接觸，也能在屏幕兩端悄然發(fā)生。</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><b style="font-size:20px;">1. Online Interview (AIME Onboarding)</b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">Today was the official start of my internship with AIME, and I participated in the online interview sessions. Because I had already browsed AIME’s website and had experience in sociology fieldwork back in China, I was genuinely excited to step into this new cross-cultural environment.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">Coming to Australia for a second Master’s in Social Work wasn’t just about professional growth — it was also about testing a concept I’ve long been exploring: cultural energy. Can culture act as a kind of energy that builds confidence, connects communities, and shifts systemic injustice? AIME’s work seems to ask the same questions, and I’m hopeful this internship will help me explore some answers. </p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><b style="font-size:20px;">1. Hoodie Economics：當(dāng)“關(guān)系”成為核心貨幣</b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">下午的學(xué)習(xí)聚焦于Jack Manning Bancroft的《Hoodie Economics》。</p> <p class="ql-block">初讀這個(gè)書(shū)名時(shí)，我曾誤以為是關(guān)于亞文化經(jīng)濟(jì)的研究，翻開(kāi)后才發(fā)現(xiàn)，它更像一場(chǎng)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的溫柔反叛。<b style="color:rgb(237, 35, 8);">“經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)應(yīng)反映我們珍視的事物，而非僅僅是我們售賣的東西”</b>——這句核心觀點(diǎn)像一塊投入湖面的石子，在我腦海里漾開(kāi)層層漣漪。</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">最觸動(dòng)我的是那句：“我們不需要修復(fù)人，我們需要改變那些看不見(jiàn)他們的系統(tǒng)?！边@讓我想起在湘西記錄老拳師口述史時(shí)的經(jīng)歷：當(dāng)主流視角將譚氏苗拳視為“落后的傳統(tǒng)”時(shí)，當(dāng)?shù)厍嗄暌矟u漸羞于承認(rèn)這份文化遺產(chǎn)；而當(dāng)我們用數(shù)字化手段還原其歷史價(jià)值，用課間操的形式嵌入校園生活后，年輕人眼中的光芒便重新亮起。原來(lái)，<b style="color:rgb(237, 35, 8);">中澳語(yǔ)境下的“賦能”，本質(zhì)上都是對(duì)“看見(jiàn)”與“認(rèn)可”的渴望。</b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">Bancroft提出的“關(guān)系型經(jīng)濟(jì)”概念，與譚必友教授的“文化能量說(shuō)”形成了奇妙的共振。兩者都拒絕將人簡(jiǎn)化為“服務(wù)對(duì)象”或“經(jīng)濟(jì)單元”，而是相信：<b style="color:rgb(237, 35, 8);">當(dāng)文化認(rèn)同被激活，當(dāng)人與人的聯(lián)結(jié)足夠深厚，群體自身就會(huì)生長(zhǎng)出解決問(wèn)題的力量。</b>這讓我對(duì)接下來(lái)的實(shí)習(xí)有了更清晰的方向：不是帶著“解決方案”而來(lái)，而是帶著傾聽(tīng)的耳朵與共情的心，成為文化能量流動(dòng)的見(jiàn)證者與橋梁。 </p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><b style="font-size:20px;">1. Hoodie Economics – Learning and Reflection </b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">Today I learned about Hoodie Economics, a powerful book by Jack Manning Bancroft. The core idea is simple but transformative: <b>“Economics should reflect what we value, not just what we sell.”</b></p> <p class="ql-block">One quote that stayed with me was:</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><i>"We don’t need to fix people. We need to change the systems that don’t see them."</i></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><i>— Hoodie Economics, Jack Manning Bancroft</i></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">This directly challenged the dominant approach that measures value based on productivity or financial contribution. Instead, Bancroft suggests that the economy can be <b>relational</b>, <b>cultural</b>, and <b>imaginative</b>, where human connection is the main currency.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">Another concept that resonated with me is the <b>"Imagi–Nation"</b> as a systemic alternative, where creativity and story are used to rebuild social logic:</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><i>"We build with the tools of culture, imagination, and mentoring. This is our infrastructure."</i></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">This helped me reflect more deeply on my original question in Section 1: Can culture be a form of energy that builds confidence, solidarity, and social equity?</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">My answer now feels clearer. Through Bancroft’s writing, I see that culture is not an "add-on" to development — it is the <b>starting force</b>. When systems are designed with relationships and cultural expression at the center, they become regenerative rather than extractive. This aligns closely with social work’s commitment to <b>person-in-environment</b>, <b>anti-oppressive practice</b>, and <b>community-led empowerment</b>.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">It also challenges me to rethink what I value in my own work: Am I trying to “support people” within broken systems? Or am I willing to <b>co-create</b> new ones, even if they look very different from the mainstream?</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><b style="font-size:20px;">2、《Sea the Weed》：被誤讀的“雜草”與文化的韌性</b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">傍晚觀看的短片《Sea the Weed》，用詩(shī)意的鏡頭語(yǔ)言給了我更深的沖擊。沒(méi)有旁白的刻意說(shuō)教，只有海草在洋流中自在舒展的畫(huà)面，搭配那句低語(yǔ)：“<b style="color:rgb(237, 35, 8);">我們是雜草。你試圖將我們拔出，但我們總會(huì)回來(lái)。更強(qiáng)韌，更狂野，無(wú)處不在。</b>” </p> <p class="ql-block"> “雜草”的隱喻讓我心頭一震。這不正是邊緣文化與弱勢(shì)群體的生存狀態(tài)嗎？<b style="color:rgb(237, 35, 8);">在湘西，譚氏苗拳曾被視為“難登大雅之堂的土功夫”；在澳洲，原住民文化長(zhǎng)期被主流敘事邊緣化。但短片里的海草，從未因“雜草”的標(biāo)簽而停止生長(zhǎng)——它是“海洋的根基，生命的起點(diǎn)”，只是未被看見(jiàn)。</b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">這讓我反思過(guò)去的田野工作：當(dāng)我們帶著“保護(hù)”或“改進(jìn)”的心態(tài)介入時(shí)，是否也在無(wú)意中扮演了“拔草人”的角色？是否忽略了那些看似“不起眼”的文化實(shí)踐中，早已蘊(yùn)含著自洽的生存智慧與韌性？AIME選擇用這樣一部短片作為新人培訓(xùn)的內(nèi)容，或許正是在提醒我們：<b style="color:rgb(237, 35, 8);">社會(huì)工作的第一步，不是“修復(fù)”，而是“看見(jiàn)”——看見(jiàn)那些被主流價(jià)值遮蔽的光芒。 </b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><b style="font-size:20px;">2. “Sea the Weed” – Video Reflection </b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">This evening, I watched the AIME short film Sea the Weed. It’s not a documentary or educational piece in a conventional sense — it’s poetic, metaphorical, and nonlinear. But precisely because of that, it moved me.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">One of the most striking lines from the narration was:</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><i>"We are the weed. You try to pull us out. But we come back. Stronger. Wilder. Everywhere."</i></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">This made me pause. The “weed” becomes a symbol of people, cultures, and systems that are <b>rejected by dominant narratives</b> — those who don’t fit the mainstream image of productivity or perfection.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">In the video, there’s a powerful visual of seaweed flowing freely in water, untouched by man-made design. The narrator speaks over this:</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><i>"Seaweed isn’t a weed. It’s the base of the ocean. The beginning of life. You just didn’t see it."</i></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">This was personally meaningful for me. As a person from a different cultural background, engaging in a cross-cultural internship in Australia, I often wonder: Who decides what is valuable? Whose story gets told?</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">In past social work fieldwork (especially in rural China), we were often taught to “help modernize” or “improve” local practices — which now I realize was sometimes a form of cultural flattening. Sea the Weed made me question: Were we actually helping? Or were we failing to see the <b>organic systems of value</b> already present?p</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">Now, I’m learning to let go of the desire to “fix” and instead ask:</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><b><i> How do we listen better?</i></b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><b><i> How do we protect what’s already wise, even if it doesn’t look like Western knowledge?</i></b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"> How can I support models like AIME, which honour cultural logic rather than erase it?</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">The video doesn’t give answers — it gives <b>permission to feel</b>, to question, and to imagine differently. As a future social worker, I think this is what we need more of.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><b style="font-size:20px;">3、IMAGI-NATION：在想象中搭建的文化橋梁 </b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><b> Exploring the IMAGI-NATION Platform</b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">I also explored the IMAGI-NATION platform. Honestly, it was a bit difficult to understand at first — very conceptual, with layered meanings. But what I did grasp felt meaningful:</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">It’s a living version of Hoodie Economics, built on imagination, relationship, and culture.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">It doesn’t follow a top-down model — instead, it encourages co-creation, decentralisation, and trust.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">It even plans its own conclusion in 2033 — which suggests that legacy and sustainability are more important than permanence or profit.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">I plan to revisit the platform tomorrow more carefully, especially the videos and city-building metaphors.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"> <b>Looking Ahead: Sea the Weed Activities</b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">At the end of the month, there will be an opportunity to engage directly with AIME’s Sea the Weed campaign. I hope to participate in person — not just to observe, but to interact, reflect, and expand my understanding of relational work in real time.</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">Before then, I’ll keep learning. My plan is to:</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"> 1.Reread parts of Hoodie Economics with deeper focus</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"> 2.Watch more of AIME’s creative materials and storytelling</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"> 3.Explore how these concepts relate to social work practice, especially in culturally diverse and community-led settings</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">初探IMAGI-NATION平臺(tái)時(shí)，我像闖入了一個(gè)充滿隱喻的迷宮。沒(méi)有清晰的“功能按鈕”，更像一個(gè)由故事、藝術(shù)與對(duì)話編織的網(wǎng)絡(luò)。這與我熟悉的“項(xiàng)目管理系統(tǒng)”截然不同，卻精準(zhǔn)呼應(yīng)了Hoodie Economics的主張：用文化、想象與陪伴作為“基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施”，而非冰冷的流程與指標(biāo)。 </p> <p class="ql-block">平臺(tái)計(jì)劃在2033年“終結(jié)”的設(shè)定尤其耐人尋味——它不追求永恒，而是專注于當(dāng)下的聯(lián)結(jié)與生長(zhǎng)，如同海草在洋流中隨遇而安，卻始終保持生命力。這讓我想到湘西譚氏苗拳傳承：我們從未試圖建立一個(gè)“標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化”的傳承體系，而是鼓勵(lì)每個(gè)村寨根據(jù)自己的理解改編套路，只要那份“族群記憶”的內(nèi)核還在，形式的流動(dòng)反而讓文化更有活力。</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">尾聲：期待與海草共生長(zhǎng) 一天的學(xué)習(xí)結(jié)束時(shí)，窗外的暮色已漫過(guò)伍倫貢的海岸線。我在筆記本上寫(xiě)下：“AIME的‘田野’，沒(méi)有固定的問(wèn)卷與訪談提綱，卻有更珍貴的禮物——<b style="color:rgb(237, 35, 8);">讓‘關(guān)系’成為方法，讓‘文化’成為動(dòng)力，讓‘想象’成為改變的起點(diǎn)。” </b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block">月底的“Sea the Weed”活動(dòng)已被我鄭重地標(biāo)記在日歷上。我期待著走出屏幕，在真實(shí)的互動(dòng)中觸摸這份“雜草哲學(xué)”的溫度，也期待著在接下來(lái)的日子里，將湘西譚氏苗拳的田野經(jīng)驗(yàn)與AIME的實(shí)踐對(duì)照，在兩種文化語(yǔ)境的對(duì)話中，更深刻地理解“文化能量”的流動(dòng)與轉(zhuǎn)化。 實(shí)習(xí)第一天，更像一場(chǎng)精神上的啟程。我知道，真正的田野才剛剛鋪開(kāi)，而我已準(zhǔn)備好做一株傾聽(tīng)土地的“海草”。</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(57, 181, 74); font-size:20px;">（作者：楊思穎，女，熤園2024屆碩士，澳大利亞伍倫貢大學(xué)25級(jí)新生）</span></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block" style="text-align:center;"><b>END</b></p><p class="ql-block" style="text-align:center;">﹀</p><p class="ql-block" style="text-align:center;">﹀</p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><b style="color:rgb(237, 35, 8); font-size:22px;">延伸閱讀</b></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block" style="text-align:center;"><b style="color:rgb(21, 100, 250); font-size:22px;">田野學(xué)新書(shū)出版信息</b></p><p class="ql-block" style="text-align:center;"><b style="color:rgb(21, 100, 250); font-size:22px;"><span class="ql-cursor">?</span></b></p> <p class="ql-block"><a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4MTYzNzE2NQ==&mid=2650691083&idx=1&sn=b7e5df4bbf2297df41a164551d81fefc&scene=21#wechat_redirect" target="_blank"><u>熤園導(dǎo)師譚必友教授新著《田野中國(guó)學(xué)先驅(qū)：嚴(yán)如熤傳》出版</u></a></p> <p class="ql-block"><a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4MTYzNzE2NQ==&mid=2650691082&idx=1&sn=04ff10dd7199f499b7489e341261c0a6&scene=21#wechat_redirect" target="_blank"><u>譚必友教授等新著《田野中國(guó)學(xué)論綱：基于浦市田野的學(xué)術(shù)反思》出版</u></a></p> <p class="ql-block"><a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA5NjYzMDc5Mw==&mid=2650418413&idx=1&sn=43f2bfd5ce4a4080a93bb58a4b09a621&scene=21#wechat_redirect" target="_blank"><u>熤園新書(shū)：《浦市文化論集：田野中國(guó)學(xué)學(xué)步集》正式出版</u></a></p> <p class="ql-block"><br></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">— END —</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">編 輯</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">文圖：楊思穎</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">審閱：陳博文</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">編輯：周歆悅</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">供 稿</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">長(zhǎng)沙玖業(yè)教育咨詢有限公司</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">營(yíng) 運(yùn)</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">瀘溪縣譚子興文化研究會(huì)</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">湘西州譚氏苗拳文化研究會(huì)</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">學(xué)術(shù)支持</span></p><p class="ql-block"><span style="color:rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size:15px;">湖南師范大學(xué)民族學(xué)與人類學(xué)研究中心</span></p><p class="ql-block"><br></p> <a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/7mY8ohXNHZ3-6WX_hzCm7g" >查看原文</a> 原文轉(zhuǎn)載自微信公眾號(hào),著作權(quán)歸作者所有